Pulpit Magazine

(By Nathan Busenitz)
This week has seen some good discussion here on Pulpit. It’s been vigorous, fun, and I hope profitable to all who have participated. Today we will wrap up the discussion (bringing an end to “the end”), closing the comment threads at 5:00 PM PST.
Why Premillennialism?
With all the theological garbage that parades itself under […]

Today’s post is a continuation from yesterday and Tuesday. This concludes our Q&A series on eschatology (with one final post on eschatology to come tomorrow). Next week we hope to respond to some of the questions dealing with other aspects of theology. 
***** 
8. I can see premillennialism in the Old Testament. But is there any New Testament evidence for […]

Today’s post is continued from yesterday — responding to questions we received during the 2007 Shepherds’ Conference.
*****
5. Can you say more in defense of your understanding of Acts 1:6–8?
The fact that Jesus (in v. 7) does not deny the disciples’ expectation of a literal, earthly kingdom involving Israel is highly significant. It suggests that their understanding […]

The following questions are representative of the Q&A cards that were handed in during the Shepherds’ Conference. If you have other questions (not included in this list), please ask them in the comments section. We will do our best to respond to them in a timely fashion.
Also, one resource we did not note in yesterday’s […]

During the Shepherds’ Conference, John MacArthur noted that we will do our best here on Pulpit to answer the many questions that were submitted by conference attendees during the week (but which couldn’t be addressed during the Q&A sessions due to time constraints).
Nearly one-fourth of the questions dealt with eschatology (specifically amillennialism) and another fourth regarded ecclesiology (from preaching […]