<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doug Pagitt&#8217;s Recent Interview</title>
	<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/</link>
	<description>A Ministry of Shepherds' Fellowship</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-104282</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-104282</guid>
					<description>You know, I'm getting really bugged by the way we throw the baby out with the bathwater.  Yes, Pagitt and McLaren have some goofy views.  In my opinion so does MacArthur.  Heck, I probably have some goofy views myself.  People call emerging people a cult because of what Pagitt says?  How about I call Calvinists haters because Calvin burned people at the stake if they disagreed with his views.  How about I call Lutherans, or anyone non-caltholic, nazis because Luther called for the expulsion of all Jews from Europe.  See the stupidity?  You would say I'm a jerk if I lumped you in with the errant views of those men, however we'd all acknowledge that despite their misguided ways they also gave us some great intellectual gifts.  Reformed people have some goofy guys.  Evangelicals have some goofy guys.  Emerging people have some goofy guys.  Pagitt, like Calvin, has some goofy things to say and some good things to say too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m getting really bugged by the way we throw the baby out with the bathwater.  Yes, Pagitt and McLaren have some goofy views.  In my opinion so does MacArthur.  Heck, I probably have some goofy views myself.  People call emerging people a cult because of what Pagitt says?  How about I call Calvinists haters because Calvin burned people at the stake if they disagreed with his views.  How about I call Lutherans, or anyone non-caltholic, nazis because Luther called for the expulsion of all Jews from Europe.  See the stupidity?  You would say I&#8217;m a jerk if I lumped you in with the errant views of those men, however we&#8217;d all acknowledge that despite their misguided ways they also gave us some great intellectual gifts.  Reformed people have some goofy guys.  Evangelicals have some goofy guys.  Emerging people have some goofy guys.  Pagitt, like Calvin, has some goofy things to say and some good things to say too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-72844</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-72844</guid>
					<description>Susan,

Pagitt seemed to have a more thorough understanding of the scripture than Todd?? More like he threw out much of it. John 14:2-3 says, “In my Father’s HOUSE are many ROOMS. If it were not so, would I have told you that I GO to prepare a PLACE for you? And if I GO and prepare a PLACE for you, I will COME again and will take you TO myself, that WHERE I am you may BE also.” 

Luke 16:23-25 “And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in TORMENTS, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am TORMENTED in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art TORMENTED.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan,</p>
<p>Pagitt seemed to have a more thorough understanding of the scripture than Todd?? More like he threw out much of it. John 14:2-3 says, “In my Father’s HOUSE are many ROOMS. If it were not so, would I have told you that I GO to prepare a PLACE for you? And if I GO and prepare a PLACE for you, I will COME again and will take you TO myself, that WHERE I am you may BE also.” </p>
<p>Luke 16:23-25 “And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in TORMENTS, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am TORMENTED in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art TORMENTED.”
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-71738</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-71738</guid>
					<description>It sounds like Todd and many others had already made decisions about Doug Pagitt before even letting him speak. The questions asked of this man were so loaded with accusation and misunderstanding, I think it reprehensible that such a disrespecting, unloving, un-Christian interview took place in the name of Jesus. As one who is genuinely trying to find out more of what the Emergent Church is trying to do in this world, I think interview and the one-sided commentaries that followed on this site -completely unhelpful. Pagitt was much more respectful and honest than Todd, and he seemed to have a more thorough understanding of Scripture and the integrity of the gospel than Todd's string of favorite judgment verses. I don't think Pagitt was trying to avoid the truth of God's judgment and our call to live godly lives. Perhaps if people actually listened to him and let themselves use the brains God gave them to think critically instead of instantly condemn, the church might truly be the Body of Christ in this world, working toward redemption and reconciliation. For we will all be judged, as you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Todd and many others had already made decisions about Doug Pagitt before even letting him speak. The questions asked of this man were so loaded with accusation and misunderstanding, I think it reprehensible that such a disrespecting, unloving, un-Christian interview took place in the name of Jesus. As one who is genuinely trying to find out more of what the Emergent Church is trying to do in this world, I think interview and the one-sided commentaries that followed on this site -completely unhelpful. Pagitt was much more respectful and honest than Todd, and he seemed to have a more thorough understanding of Scripture and the integrity of the gospel than Todd&#8217;s string of favorite judgment verses. I don&#8217;t think Pagitt was trying to avoid the truth of God&#8217;s judgment and our call to live godly lives. Perhaps if people actually listened to him and let themselves use the brains God gave them to think critically instead of instantly condemn, the church might truly be the Body of Christ in this world, working toward redemption and reconciliation. For we will all be judged, as you say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-71572</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-71572</guid>
					<description>Todd was rather arrogant at times, but after all, he's a Calvinist and that is part and parcel with Calvinism.

However, I think it is obvious that Doug is lost.  He uses warm, fuzzy words to make himself and his theology sound deep and intellectual, as well as thought out, but it's really not.  It's just burying anything concrete in a bunch of warm, fuzzy and intellectual words.

I think one interesting thing is, as Calvinism is often criticized for its surrounding arrogance and intellectual ivory tower basis that makes the gospel unreachable for the common man, what Doug believes(which I am not quite sure what that is), has the same issue.  You can't really know what to believe about anything, and I'll throw the word "platonic" in there, and "cosmology" in there, and maybe if I throw enough philosophical words in to the mix, I can avoid having concrete, explainable beliefs about pretty much anything, and I will still sound researched, well thought out, and "spiritual" if I use enough big words to explain what I may or may not believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd was rather arrogant at times, but after all, he&#8217;s a Calvinist and that is part and parcel with Calvinism.</p>
<p>However, I think it is obvious that Doug is lost.  He uses warm, fuzzy words to make himself and his theology sound deep and intellectual, as well as thought out, but it&#8217;s really not.  It&#8217;s just burying anything concrete in a bunch of warm, fuzzy and intellectual words.</p>
<p>I think one interesting thing is, as Calvinism is often criticized for its surrounding arrogance and intellectual ivory tower basis that makes the gospel unreachable for the common man, what Doug believes(which I am not quite sure what that is), has the same issue.  You can&#8217;t really know what to believe about anything, and I&#8217;ll throw the word &#8220;platonic&#8221; in there, and &#8220;cosmology&#8221; in there, and maybe if I throw enough philosophical words in to the mix, I can avoid having concrete, explainable beliefs about pretty much anything, and I will still sound researched, well thought out, and &#8220;spiritual&#8221; if I use enough big words to explain what I may or may not believe.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-70222</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-70222</guid>
					<description>Wow!  I find it interesting that we can all sit around and talk down about Doug Pagitt.  I personally do not find that to be the most Christ like approach.  Isn't that what we should be seeking to do? I mean we are Christians right? I do think it was an entertaining and very eye opening interview.  We should use it to learn about where we don't want to go with our theology.  I beg of you all though please pray for the Emergent Church, and Emergent Village. They have potential to reach millions of people, but if they are afraid of the truth then there will be no point to reaching those millions.  If you are interested in learning more on this topic please check out my web site... www.TheFireofNewDesire.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  I find it interesting that we can all sit around and talk down about Doug Pagitt.  I personally do not find that to be the most Christ like approach.  Isn&#8217;t that what we should be seeking to do? I mean we are Christians right? I do think it was an entertaining and very eye opening interview.  We should use it to learn about where we don&#8217;t want to go with our theology.  I beg of you all though please pray for the Emergent Church, and Emergent Village. They have potential to reach millions of people, but if they are afraid of the truth then there will be no point to reaching those millions.  If you are interested in learning more on this topic please check out my web site&#8230; <a href='http://www.TheFireofNewDesire.com' rel='nofollow'>www.TheFireofNewDesire.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fascinated</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-70123</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-70123</guid>
					<description>wow. all of emergent village speaks definitively in Doug Pagitt?
This is a fascinating development.

Everyone who is friends with him or remotely connected to him is now responsible for his excesses, mistakes, behavior, etc? 

That's great.

Next time someone paints us all with a broad brush because of the occasional idiocy of Pat Robertson...you get my point.

If Pagitt is not your brother, then have compassion on him as one who is lost, pray for his salvation.

If Pagitt is a wayward brother, then pray for him and read the Bible that says restore him gently, that tells you something about what God expects of you...even when you proclaim the Absolute Truth of the inerrant Word of God.

I don't see any of this in these discussions (that sadly become forums for peoples spleen venting).

It's not indicative of the Spirit of Christ and such composure is not incompatible with speaking the Truth.

For the sake of the Kingdom, our witness and the health of the Church we all need to grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. all of emergent village speaks definitively in Doug Pagitt?<br />
This is a fascinating development.</p>
<p>Everyone who is friends with him or remotely connected to him is now responsible for his excesses, mistakes, behavior, etc? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>Next time someone paints us all with a broad brush because of the occasional idiocy of Pat Robertson&#8230;you get my point.</p>
<p>If Pagitt is not your brother, then have compassion on him as one who is lost, pray for his salvation.</p>
<p>If Pagitt is a wayward brother, then pray for him and read the Bible that says restore him gently, that tells you something about what God expects of you&#8230;even when you proclaim the Absolute Truth of the inerrant Word of God.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any of this in these discussions (that sadly become forums for peoples spleen venting).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not indicative of the Spirit of Christ and such composure is not incompatible with speaking the Truth.</p>
<p>For the sake of the Kingdom, our witness and the health of the Church we all need to grow up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jerry Wragg</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69919</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69919</guid>
					<description>Michael -
If you think Doug Pagitt is a "brother in Christ" you are sadly mistaken.  His books are full of half-truths and perversions of the gospel.  And lately, with these frequent interviews, Pagitt continues to demonstrate his utter disdain for the authority of God's word.  I don't think Pagitt is a well-meaning but misguided soul at all.  Every retort he gave the host of the show was obviously a deliberate attempt to paint Todd F. as a behind-the-times, strangely unorthodox dinosaur from the archaic days of modernism.  He knew exactly what he was doing!  Once he sized up the direction of the show his rants were more like condescending dismissals in order to appear progressively Jesus-friendly.

"What about his emphasis on 'the Jesus narrative of life'?"

Doug Pagitt knows nothing of the true Jesus Christ whose very revelation is the scriptures.

2 Timothy 3:5 -
"Holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; and avoid such men as these.  7 always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth.  8 Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men corrupted in mind and disqualified regarding the faith."

Don't be deceived my friend.  Study the Gospels in depth and Pagitt's entire system crumbles under the weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael -<br />
If you think Doug Pagitt is a &#8220;brother in Christ&#8221; you are sadly mistaken.  His books are full of half-truths and perversions of the gospel.  And lately, with these frequent interviews, Pagitt continues to demonstrate his utter disdain for the authority of God&#8217;s word.  I don&#8217;t think Pagitt is a well-meaning but misguided soul at all.  Every retort he gave the host of the show was obviously a deliberate attempt to paint Todd F. as a behind-the-times, strangely unorthodox dinosaur from the archaic days of modernism.  He knew exactly what he was doing!  Once he sized up the direction of the show his rants were more like condescending dismissals in order to appear progressively Jesus-friendly.</p>
<p>&#8220;What about his emphasis on &#8216;the Jesus narrative of life&#8217;?&#8221;</p>
<p>Doug Pagitt knows nothing of the true Jesus Christ whose very revelation is the scriptures.</p>
<p>2 Timothy 3:5 -<br />
&#8220;Holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; and avoid such men as these.  7 always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth.  8 Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men corrupted in mind and disqualified regarding the faith.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be deceived my friend.  Study the Gospels in depth and Pagitt&#8217;s entire system crumbles under the weight.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott G.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69738</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69738</guid>
					<description>Where does Pagitt's ideas come from?  Surely he didn't just invent these ideas.  Does anybody have a clue as to what Pagitt might positively articulate heaven and new creation to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does Pagitt&#8217;s ideas come from?  Surely he didn&#8217;t just invent these ideas.  Does anybody have a clue as to what Pagitt might positively articulate heaven and new creation to be?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69726</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69726</guid>
					<description>Very revealing. John 14:2-3 says, "In my Father's HOUSE are many ROOMS. If it were not so, would I have told you that I GO to prepare a PLACE for you? And if I GO and prepare a PLACE for you, I will COME again and will take you TO myself, that WHERE I am you may BE also."

But of course, Christ was a Platonist. Sounds to me as if Pagitt didn't even know what HE believed.

I think Pagitt needs to read Luke 16:23-25 if he believes that no one will be sent to hell (an actual place of torment).

Luke 16:23-25 "And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very revealing. John 14:2-3 says, &#8220;In my Father&#8217;s HOUSE are many ROOMS. If it were not so, would I have told you that I GO to prepare a PLACE for you? And if I GO and prepare a PLACE for you, I will COME again and will take you TO myself, that WHERE I am you may BE also.&#8221;</p>
<p>But of course, Christ was a Platonist. Sounds to me as if Pagitt didn&#8217;t even know what HE believed.</p>
<p>I think Pagitt needs to read Luke 16:23-25 if he believes that no one will be sent to hell (an actual place of torment).</p>
<p>Luke 16:23-25 &#8220;And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: carol czech</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69459</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/10/26/doug-pagitts-recent-interview/#comment-69459</guid>
					<description>Luke 23:42-43 And he said, "Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom."And he said to him, "Truly, I say to you, TODAY you will be with me IN PARADISE."

Sounds like these two had an appointment somewhere REAL later that day. Yes....THERE!!!  Not in some future-perfect earth thousands of years later.  Would Pagitt say Jesus was offering some false metaphoric/euphamistic hope to make him feel better on his death bed?  If so, why did he not offer the same hope to the other criminal? Would he say that Jesus is a Platonist? Hmmm...Jesus did create Plato...I'll have to ponder that. 

Of course, if this whole account is just a quaint narrative, passed down by shepherds sitting around campfires, rather than the inspired, inerrant word of God, you can somehow fit that into your "theology"  

You know, we can be outraged by Pagitt's offenses against the Gospel, or we can mock Pagitt for his absurdity.  But our first response should be a profound sadness that God's name is being slandered and that thousands are being led astray by this man's false teaching.  God help them all - we need to be on our knees for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke 23:42-43 And he said, &#8220;Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.&#8221;And he said to him, &#8220;Truly, I say to you, TODAY you will be with me IN PARADISE.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like these two had an appointment somewhere REAL later that day. Yes&#8230;.THERE!!!  Not in some future-perfect earth thousands of years later.  Would Pagitt say Jesus was offering some false metaphoric/euphamistic hope to make him feel better on his death bed?  If so, why did he not offer the same hope to the other criminal? Would he say that Jesus is a Platonist? Hmmm&#8230;Jesus did create Plato&#8230;I&#8217;ll have to ponder that. </p>
<p>Of course, if this whole account is just a quaint narrative, passed down by shepherds sitting around campfires, rather than the inspired, inerrant word of God, you can somehow fit that into your &#8220;theology&#8221;  </p>
<p>You know, we can be outraged by Pagitt&#8217;s offenses against the Gospel, or we can mock Pagitt for his absurdity.  But our first response should be a profound sadness that God&#8217;s name is being slandered and that thousands are being led astray by this man&#8217;s false teaching.  God help them all - we need to be on our knees for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
