<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Membership Matters (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/</link>
	<description>A Ministry of Shepherds' Fellowship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:54:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-53735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-53735</guid>
		<description>Has anyone considered that it is the responsibility of the elders to know where the sheep of the flock are at in their spiritual walk?  Membership doesn&#039;t accomplish this.  If size of the church becomes the excuse, then perhaps that body should be split up to shepherd it properly.  Formal membership gets people as committed as they were to begin with and no more, but proper shepherding will guide the people into a commitment that needs no paper signing.  It seems odd that the blame is so easily shifted to the one who has a conscience problem with formal membership rather onto the pastors who are lacking in their shepherding and don&#039;t even know the state of the sheep they are responsible before God for and they try to write it off with membership as a tool to supposedly take care of this.  The argument of commitment being a rare commodity these days is also very weak.  There have always been issues of this sort through the ages.  Or is there suddenly something new under the sun that we need to invent a new man made sunscreen for?

Another issue that has yet to be brought into the fray is the fact that the vast majority of churches in this country are State churches.  I hesitate to even bring this one up because people often go into a fit of irrational accusations of saying that you are rebellious if you don&#039;t obey the State, etc...  But the State does not require a church to join it (incorporate) and a simple reading of the State documents regarding churches (religious organizations) that incorporate themselves into the body of the State, thus making them subservient to it, by becoming a not for profit corporation should be enough for anyone to know to keep away from becoming a formal member of such an organization.  Much blood of many martyrs has been spilled over this very issue.  I have a friend who is a pastor from Scotland and he was astonished to learn that the churches in America could possibly be in such a state.  In a totally flabbergasted manner he could only say, &quot;Why on earth would they ever do that!?&quot;  Christians in Scotland may be more aware perhaps of the price paid by many of our brothers for resisting State control over the church and would understandably be shocked that one would actually join the State voluntarily.  Interestingly in the United States, the State at first refused to allow a church to incorporate because there were godly civil leaders at that time with understanding that the civil government has no business ruling over church matters.  

All that to say that it is clear though that one could still be totally committed to a body of believers and minister among them wholeheartedly without signing on the dotted line.  And requiring one to go against one&#039;s conscience on an issue that is not clear, by any means, in the Bible is unconscionable.  To call it sin because one has a disagreement with the elders on an issue that is not a clear biblical teaching and for the elders to lord their authority over a believer in this matter refusing them their liberty in Christ would be reprehensible to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered that it is the responsibility of the elders to know where the sheep of the flock are at in their spiritual walk?  Membership doesn&#8217;t accomplish this.  If size of the church becomes the excuse, then perhaps that body should be split up to shepherd it properly.  Formal membership gets people as committed as they were to begin with and no more, but proper shepherding will guide the people into a commitment that needs no paper signing.  It seems odd that the blame is so easily shifted to the one who has a conscience problem with formal membership rather onto the pastors who are lacking in their shepherding and don&#8217;t even know the state of the sheep they are responsible before God for and they try to write it off with membership as a tool to supposedly take care of this.  The argument of commitment being a rare commodity these days is also very weak.  There have always been issues of this sort through the ages.  Or is there suddenly something new under the sun that we need to invent a new man made sunscreen for?</p>
<p>Another issue that has yet to be brought into the fray is the fact that the vast majority of churches in this country are State churches.  I hesitate to even bring this one up because people often go into a fit of irrational accusations of saying that you are rebellious if you don&#8217;t obey the State, etc&#8230;  But the State does not require a church to join it (incorporate) and a simple reading of the State documents regarding churches (religious organizations) that incorporate themselves into the body of the State, thus making them subservient to it, by becoming a not for profit corporation should be enough for anyone to know to keep away from becoming a formal member of such an organization.  Much blood of many martyrs has been spilled over this very issue.  I have a friend who is a pastor from Scotland and he was astonished to learn that the churches in America could possibly be in such a state.  In a totally flabbergasted manner he could only say, &#8220;Why on earth would they ever do that!?&#8221;  Christians in Scotland may be more aware perhaps of the price paid by many of our brothers for resisting State control over the church and would understandably be shocked that one would actually join the State voluntarily.  Interestingly in the United States, the State at first refused to allow a church to incorporate because there were godly civil leaders at that time with understanding that the civil government has no business ruling over church matters.  </p>
<p>All that to say that it is clear though that one could still be totally committed to a body of believers and minister among them wholeheartedly without signing on the dotted line.  And requiring one to go against one&#8217;s conscience on an issue that is not clear, by any means, in the Bible is unconscionable.  To call it sin because one has a disagreement with the elders on an issue that is not a clear biblical teaching and for the elders to lord their authority over a believer in this matter refusing them their liberty in Christ would be reprehensible to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-52576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-52576</guid>
		<description>oops that does not link to my blog

but this is mine

&lt;a href=&quot;http://dmarvin811.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dmarvin811.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops that does not link to my blog</p>
<p>but this is mine</p>
<p><a href="http://dmarvin811.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">dmarvin811.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-52118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-52118</guid>
		<description>I write a lot about this subject in my blog also, it is a hot subject for me. To me the Bible is clear we are not to look to man for answer&#039;s or leadership but only to Christ.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/25yvuf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A list of verses to prove this&lt;/a&gt;

In my blog I write: That is why they drove the planes into the towers, because they believed they could &quot;do something to earn&quot; heaven, but they were wrong and most all religions are wrong. Jesus even had the harshest words for the scribes and Pharisees. The mere fact there are different denominations negates the one true way as talked about in Jeremiah 32:38-40. 

I go on to say: We are to look to Jesus for leadership, not man. The Bible says to evaluate everything to see if it is of God by its fruit, good tree = good fruit; a bad tree can never bear good fruit. We don’t even have to address the Catholic Church and the mass pedophiles, and the crusades to determine the fruit, it is obvious. 

God’s word declares that this is God&#039;s plan of salvation; 1. Hear the WORD of God. 2. Believe that Jesus is the Messiah. 3. Repent of your ways that are contrary to God’s will. 4. Be Baptized INTO Christ for the forgiveness of your sins and to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 5. Remain faithful to the Covenant you have made with God.

Church or building is not part of this plan at all. 

You wrote in the article: &quot;In the book of Acts, much of the terminology fits only with the concept of formal church membership. Phrases such as “the whole congregation” (6:5)&quot; 

In KJV and Darby and Young&#039;s Literal it says &quot;pleased the whole multitude&quot; or &quot;pleasing before all the multitude&quot; which is very different. It all comes down to presupposition, if your presupposition is that we must attend a church then you will find things to agree to that. The writers of the KJV had a presupposition that we attend church but that was detrimental to the translating. The Bible never even has the word &quot;church&#039; in it at all, ever. Ekklesia translates to assembly, not even &quot;the assembly&quot; either. Greek word &quot;kyridakon&quot; which means religious meeting place is not even in the Bible.

Lets take the Sabbath also in Genesis 2:2-3  &quot;And God had finished on the seventh day his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and hallowed it, because that on it he rested from all his work which God had created in making it.&quot;

He rested, not because he was tired but that the work was complete. Now we have a completion in Jesus and we are in His rest. 

Hebrews 4:1 &quot;Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into &lt;b&gt;his rest&lt;/b&gt;, any of you should seem to come short of it.&quot;

Hebrews 4:9-11 &quot;There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. For he that is entered into &lt;b&gt;his rest&lt;/b&gt;, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.&quot;

Jesus is the Sabbath, the completion not a Saturday or Sunday. We are complete in Christ, nothing more is required for salvation it ends in Christ. Not a man made building and established hierarchy.

As Christians though, we are never forget &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2fv7bg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Commission&lt;/a&gt;.

For Him +†+,
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write a lot about this subject in my blog also, it is a hot subject for me. To me the Bible is clear we are not to look to man for answer&#8217;s or leadership but only to Christ.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/25yvuf" rel="nofollow">A list of verses to prove this</a></p>
<p>In my blog I write: That is why they drove the planes into the towers, because they believed they could &#8220;do something to earn&#8221; heaven, but they were wrong and most all religions are wrong. Jesus even had the harshest words for the scribes and Pharisees. The mere fact there are different denominations negates the one true way as talked about in Jeremiah 32:38-40. </p>
<p>I go on to say: We are to look to Jesus for leadership, not man. The Bible says to evaluate everything to see if it is of God by its fruit, good tree = good fruit; a bad tree can never bear good fruit. We don’t even have to address the Catholic Church and the mass pedophiles, and the crusades to determine the fruit, it is obvious. </p>
<p>God’s word declares that this is God&#8217;s plan of salvation; 1. Hear the WORD of God. 2. Believe that Jesus is the Messiah. 3. Repent of your ways that are contrary to God’s will. 4. Be Baptized INTO Christ for the forgiveness of your sins and to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 5. Remain faithful to the Covenant you have made with God.</p>
<p>Church or building is not part of this plan at all. </p>
<p>You wrote in the article: &#8220;In the book of Acts, much of the terminology fits only with the concept of formal church membership. Phrases such as “the whole congregation” (6:5)&#8221; </p>
<p>In KJV and Darby and Young&#8217;s Literal it says &#8220;pleased the whole multitude&#8221; or &#8220;pleasing before all the multitude&#8221; which is very different. It all comes down to presupposition, if your presupposition is that we must attend a church then you will find things to agree to that. The writers of the KJV had a presupposition that we attend church but that was detrimental to the translating. The Bible never even has the word &#8220;church&#8217; in it at all, ever. Ekklesia translates to assembly, not even &#8220;the assembly&#8221; either. Greek word &#8220;kyridakon&#8221; which means religious meeting place is not even in the Bible.</p>
<p>Lets take the Sabbath also in Genesis 2:2-3  &#8220;And God had finished on the seventh day his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and hallowed it, because that on it he rested from all his work which God had created in making it.&#8221;</p>
<p>He rested, not because he was tired but that the work was complete. Now we have a completion in Jesus and we are in His rest. </p>
<p>Hebrews 4:1 &#8220;Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into <b>his rest</b>, any of you should seem to come short of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hebrews 4:9-11 &#8220;There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. For he that is entered into <b>his rest</b>, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jesus is the Sabbath, the completion not a Saturday or Sunday. We are complete in Christ, nothing more is required for salvation it ends in Christ. Not a man made building and established hierarchy.</p>
<p>As Christians though, we are never forget <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2fv7bg" rel="nofollow">The Great Commission</a>.</p>
<p>For Him +†+,<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51728</guid>
		<description>Jesse, I&#039;m from the Memphis, TN area and most if not all Southern Baptist churches in my area require potential members to be &quot;rebaptized&quot; even if they were biblically baptized in another denomination. I have had issues with this practice for several years and the only reason I&#039;ve been able to come up with as to why this is required is the number of &quot;Church of Christs&quot; in the south wanting to join Southern Baptist Churches. As you may well know, The Church of Christ has an unbiblical view of baptism in that they count it as a sacrament and requirement for salvation. So I guess instead of reviewing each baptism on a case by case basis, they&#039;ve decided to disallow anyone to join unless they&#039;ve been baptised &quot;again&quot;? I just hope this practice doesn&#039;t hinder our advancement of the gospel within the SBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, I&#8217;m from the Memphis, TN area and most if not all Southern Baptist churches in my area require potential members to be &#8220;rebaptized&#8221; even if they were biblically baptized in another denomination. I have had issues with this practice for several years and the only reason I&#8217;ve been able to come up with as to why this is required is the number of &#8220;Church of Christs&#8221; in the south wanting to join Southern Baptist Churches. As you may well know, The Church of Christ has an unbiblical view of baptism in that they count it as a sacrament and requirement for salvation. So I guess instead of reviewing each baptism on a case by case basis, they&#8217;ve decided to disallow anyone to join unless they&#8217;ve been baptised &#8220;again&#8221;? I just hope this practice doesn&#8217;t hinder our advancement of the gospel within the SBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackW</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51431</link>
		<dc:creator>JackW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51431</guid>
		<description>Jon, so faithfulness and commitment are measured by whether or not you are a formal member of a church?

... and if you don&#039;t like something about the church, show your commitment by finding another church or starting your own?

... and if you don&#039;t like something about the church, but stay and work to see it become more biblical you&#039;re not being faithful because your name&#039;s not on a list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, so faithfulness and commitment are measured by whether or not you are a formal member of a church?</p>
<p>&#8230; and if you don&#8217;t like something about the church, show your commitment by finding another church or starting your own?</p>
<p>&#8230; and if you don&#8217;t like something about the church, but stay and work to see it become more biblical you&#8217;re not being faithful because your name&#8217;s not on a list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51411</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article.  I think this is a huge problem.  A lot of people think that they can be committed to something without committing to anything!  Just live with a woman; you don&#039;t have to marry her to be committed.  The problem is that when things get rough you just walk out and no one has any leverage on you to make you stay.  Same thing in the church.  I would posit that the bigger problem is that we have allowed people to be members who do not take their commitment any further than signing the roll.  They do not participate in ministry and they regularly absent themselves from the assembling of the church.  I would like to see churches really stand up and say: &quot;If you want to come and sit then you are welcome but if you are going to be a member you need to commit to being involved in what we are doing for the Kingdom!&quot;  It is how we motivate each other to love and good works.  I know some have the already tagged me a pharisee!
In response to people whining about not have a good church: I think there is a lot of problem in our country with people planting churches just because they cannot find one of their particular flavor.  That may not always be good.  But, on the other hand it does mean that there are a lot of pastors and ministries out there looking to plant a church.  If you are in a place where there is really not a good church then perhaps you should contact someone who you think is doing church biblically and see if they could help you start a good church.  Or perhaps one should find a good church and move there and get a job.  This came up in another thread a while back but why will people move somewhere for a job and then find a church as though the job is what is important.  Why not put your family in a good church and then find a job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article.  I think this is a huge problem.  A lot of people think that they can be committed to something without committing to anything!  Just live with a woman; you don&#8217;t have to marry her to be committed.  The problem is that when things get rough you just walk out and no one has any leverage on you to make you stay.  Same thing in the church.  I would posit that the bigger problem is that we have allowed people to be members who do not take their commitment any further than signing the roll.  They do not participate in ministry and they regularly absent themselves from the assembling of the church.  I would like to see churches really stand up and say: &#8220;If you want to come and sit then you are welcome but if you are going to be a member you need to commit to being involved in what we are doing for the Kingdom!&#8221;  It is how we motivate each other to love and good works.  I know some have the already tagged me a pharisee!<br />
In response to people whining about not have a good church: I think there is a lot of problem in our country with people planting churches just because they cannot find one of their particular flavor.  That may not always be good.  But, on the other hand it does mean that there are a lot of pastors and ministries out there looking to plant a church.  If you are in a place where there is really not a good church then perhaps you should contact someone who you think is doing church biblically and see if they could help you start a good church.  Or perhaps one should find a good church and move there and get a job.  This came up in another thread a while back but why will people move somewhere for a job and then find a church as though the job is what is important.  Why not put your family in a good church and then find a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51342</guid>
		<description>Steve, 

Discipline will probably be addressed tomorrow. If the question about why you can’t discipline a non-member is not addressed tomorrow, ask it again.

Thanks,

Jesse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, </p>
<p>Discipline will probably be addressed tomorrow. If the question about why you can’t discipline a non-member is not addressed tomorrow, ask it again.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jesse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51341</guid>
		<description>JackW,

Just about the most common call Grace gets is from people around the country who don’t have a good church, wondering what to do. I have sympathy for your struggle. This is why Grace, and John, are so committed to training pastors. Nevertheless, I would urge you to find the best church you can, and join it whole-heartedly. Even if it is flawed, you really should use your best discernment in finding the best of the available choices—or move somewhere where there is a good church. 
If you are not committed to a local body, even if it is as flawed as Corinth, you really are missing out on the blessings which come from being united to a church and their leaders.

Jesse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JackW,</p>
<p>Just about the most common call Grace gets is from people around the country who don’t have a good church, wondering what to do. I have sympathy for your struggle. This is why Grace, and John, are so committed to training pastors. Nevertheless, I would urge you to find the best church you can, and join it whole-heartedly. Even if it is flawed, you really should use your best discernment in finding the best of the available choices—or move somewhere where there is a good church.<br />
If you are not committed to a local body, even if it is as flawed as Corinth, you really are missing out on the blessings which come from being united to a church and their leaders.</p>
<p>Jesse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51337</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

I would have strong reservations if you were asked to be rebaptized in order to join a church. If it really is a first baptist church that is asking you to be rebaptized (which I find hard to beleive), I&#039;d love to hear more about it. If you were truly saved when you were baptized, you should not be rebaptized to become a member. 

Thanks,
Jesse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>I would have strong reservations if you were asked to be rebaptized in order to join a church. If it really is a first baptist church that is asking you to be rebaptized (which I find hard to beleive), I&#8217;d love to hear more about it. If you were truly saved when you were baptized, you should not be rebaptized to become a member. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jesse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackW</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51309</link>
		<dc:creator>JackW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/08/27/why-membership-matters-part-1/#comment-51309</guid>
		<description>Roman Authority: I need to see your membership roll.

Church Elders: May we ask why?

Roman Authority: In the very near future we will have need of fresh meat for the lions and fuel for the street lamps.

Church Elders: Maybe we should reconsider this membership roll thing ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roman Authority: I need to see your membership roll.</p>
<p>Church Elders: May we ask why?</p>
<p>Roman Authority: In the very near future we will have need of fresh meat for the lions and fuel for the street lamps.</p>
<p>Church Elders: Maybe we should reconsider this membership roll thing &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
