Comments on: Mo and PoMo (Part 1) http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/ A Ministry of Shepherds' Fellowship Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:59:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: michael http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32554 Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:51:45 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32554 thanks...i will read. thanks…i will read.

]]> by: johnp http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32553 Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:48:45 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32553 I agree. I see it happening with some Christians around me, trying to be like the world using the reasoning that they will win the world to Christ. But that is the opposite of what we are called to be. kristinethraen, you wrote: "While the postmodern church stumbles around, attempting to be “cool”, and to keep up with the world’s incessantly changing fads, it will only be laughed and mocked at, by the very eyes of those it wishes to appeal towards." well put...that about sums it up john I agree. I see it happening with some Christians around me, trying to be like the world using the reasoning that they will win the world to Christ. But that is the opposite of what we are called to be.

kristinethraen, you wrote:
“While the postmodern church stumbles around, attempting to be “cool”, and to keep up with the world’s incessantly changing fads, it will only be laughed and mocked at, by the very eyes of those it wishes to appeal towards.”

well put…that about sums it up

john

]]> by: David http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32459 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:01:52 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32459 Indeed. The word is supposed to "cut to the heart" not tickle to the ear. Indeed. The word is supposed to “cut to the heart” not tickle to the ear.

]]> by: Mike http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32297 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:16:47 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32297 A related link that Phil Johnson posted on his blog: http://phillipjohnson.blogspot.com/2005/09/excellent-jeremiad-from-mr-spurgeon.html A related link that Phil Johnson posted on his blog:

http://phillipjohnson.blogspot.com/2005/09/excellent-jeremiad-from-mr-spurgeon.html

]]> by: Jeff de Ruyter http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32258 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:16:32 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32258 I agree, this is just an intro. But he is right. The same problems that modernism had, post modernism has. I do not understand why Christians have difficulty seeing this. I agree, this is just an intro. But he is right. The same problems that modernism had, post modernism has. I do not understand why Christians have difficulty seeing this.

]]> by: kristinethraen http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32252 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:29:48 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32252 And I'm quite confident that the direction this series is headed, is towards the clear argument that the church in this age will make the exact same error, when it attempts to reconcile with postmodernism. With it's fervent desire to be "relevant", the postmodern church will become irrelevant. While the postmodern church stumbles around, attempting to be "cool", and to keep up with the world's incessantly changing fads, it will only be laughed and mocked at, by the very eyes of those it wishes to appeal towards. And I’m quite confident that the direction this series is headed, is towards the clear argument that the church in this age will make the exact same error, when it attempts to reconcile with postmodernism.

With it’s fervent desire to be “relevant”, the postmodern church will become irrelevant. While the postmodern church stumbles around, attempting to be “cool”, and to keep up with the world’s incessantly changing fads, it will only be laughed and mocked at, by the very eyes of those it wishes to appeal towards.

]]> by: michael http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32235 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:07:03 +0000 http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/06/26/mo-and-pomo-part-1/#comment-32235 i wonder what the word for modernism was in christ's time. given christ always submitted to the father but the culture did not, and therefore he operated outside the norms of jewish tradition, i wonder how they labeled him compared to the hollow legalism they established. i wonder what the word for modernism was in christ’s time. given christ always submitted to the father but the culture did not, and therefore he operated outside the norms of jewish tradition, i wonder how they labeled him compared to the hollow legalism they established.

]]>