<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Young Is Too Young? Children and Baptism</title>
	<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/</link>
	<description>A Ministry of Shepherds' Fellowship</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ray B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17265</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17265</guid>
					<description>Thomas , 
 Thank you fpr your kind response. This discussion makes us all look into the word of God.
  Faith comes by hearing the word of God. Romans 10 :17. Since the scriptures are inspired of God , (2 Tim. 3 :16 ) then the scriptures come form above.  And the scriptures make you wise unto salvation.( 2 Tim. 3 :15 ). That would be my ansrwer to your question about the ears to hear the gospel.
  Confession comes before faith in Romans 10 : 9 and 10. There is the example of the Ethiopian confession in Acts 8. No , I have never baptized anyone until they make a confession of faith in Jesus Christ. If they cannot make that confession then they are not ready to be baptized and to live the new life in Jesus Christ.
   Sometimes in the book the Acts there were private and public baptisms. But like you I like for them to be public when possible for the purpose of the person declaring their faith and to teach those who are searching. However , there have been times in personal studies with people that they would not want to wait and would immediately like the Ethiopian and the jailer want to be immersed for the forgiveness of their sins. Because thy would see themselves as sinners needing to be cleansed in the blood of Jesus and out of their beleif in His blood cleansing them would confess and be baptized to have their sins washed away.
   I cannot get away from I Peter 3 :21 . And no , I do not think the text says that baptism is the symbolism  , it is Noah and the ark. It just says that baptism saves you by the resurrection of Jesus. I cannot leave out any part of the plan of salvation. Baptism does not take away from the gift status of salvation. It is all a gift but it must be received. To believe that sins are washed  away in baptism is a step of faith. 
   I am convinced , whatever the conclusion you come to or what I come to , where I think the church must refocus is in making disciples. Too many have made shallow responses but have not persevered in faith. Could be beause we have not spent enought time teaching the total cost of discipleship. Perhaps we all need to examine our teaching and make sure it tis not weak and shallow as well.
  Thank you for the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas ,<br />
 Thank you fpr your kind response. This discussion makes us all look into the word of God.<br />
  Faith comes by hearing the word of God. Romans 10 :17. Since the scriptures are inspired of God , (2 Tim. 3 :16 ) then the scriptures come form above.  And the scriptures make you wise unto salvation.( 2 Tim. 3 :15 ). That would be my ansrwer to your question about the ears to hear the gospel.<br />
  Confession comes before faith in Romans 10 : 9 and 10. There is the example of the Ethiopian confession in Acts 8. No , I have never baptized anyone until they make a confession of faith in Jesus Christ. If they cannot make that confession then they are not ready to be baptized and to live the new life in Jesus Christ.<br />
   Sometimes in the book the Acts there were private and public baptisms. But like you I like for them to be public when possible for the purpose of the person declaring their faith and to teach those who are searching. However , there have been times in personal studies with people that they would not want to wait and would immediately like the Ethiopian and the jailer want to be immersed for the forgiveness of their sins. Because thy would see themselves as sinners needing to be cleansed in the blood of Jesus and out of their beleif in His blood cleansing them would confess and be baptized to have their sins washed away.<br />
   I cannot get away from I Peter 3 :21 . And no , I do not think the text says that baptism is the symbolism  , it is Noah and the ark. It just says that baptism saves you by the resurrection of Jesus. I cannot leave out any part of the plan of salvation. Baptism does not take away from the gift status of salvation. It is all a gift but it must be received. To believe that sins are washed  away in baptism is a step of faith.<br />
   I am convinced , whatever the conclusion you come to or what I come to , where I think the church must refocus is in making disciples. Too many have made shallow responses but have not persevered in faith. Could be beause we have not spent enought time teaching the total cost of discipleship. Perhaps we all need to examine our teaching and make sure it tis not weak and shallow as well.<br />
  Thank you for the discussion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas Twitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17225</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 04:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17225</guid>
					<description>Ray B.,

Where do the ears come from to hear the gospel? Desire comes from understanding, and in John 3.3 it is written, "exept one is born from above he is not able to see the Kingdom." The word for see here is eido which means to "know" or to comprehend with the mind. Literally it could mean sight, but it goes further than that, for Jesus in quoting Isaiah speaks of the eyes of the understanding being necessary for the repentant sinner to be able to turn and be saved. Those same Scriptures also include the ears.

Now it is a well known fact that when conception happens, (at conception a thing is born), the fetus has to develope the equipment to be able to hear. The word born come from the Old English word borne which means to be carried. Birth happens later when the one who has been born along breaks forth from the womb. So it is true that God has been knowing us from before we were formed in the womb. In other words, a person is born again long before they are ever able to discern, and therefore to desire to come to the Son. As Jesus said, the wind comes from where we know not but we see the effect of it. So is everyone who is born from above. That stange word anothen, beside meaning from above, carries the meaning "from the beginning," also.

Baptism then comes after salvation and is not in obedience to faith but is born of it. This is neither a paedo or believers baptimal truth. John the baptist was a believer from the womb, so was David and Jeremiah. Perhaps Paul also. In Paul's case it is obvious that his conversion in the "declarative" sense happened long after he was "called from the womb for this very pupose." And, I do not remember his baptism....and he was not sent to baptize, laying to waste the idea that it is necessary, demanded, or an anxious expediency. But it is expected.

I happen to believe in believer's baptism. That means that a person is a believer when they are baptised, not a believer as a result of their baptism. For your formula to work, Ray, a person could not make the confession that they are believers in Christ until after they came up out of the water. What perameters then, do you use to determine who should be baptized? Seeing that, "For God loved the world in this way, that he gave his only begotten Son that that the ones who are believing in him should not perish but have eternal life."

I have to agree that most of the reasoning and the means by which we baptize has to do with tradition. There is far more to commend believer's baptism, however, especially in the aspect of public testimony. But, that is rarely carried out. Usually, baptism is portrayed as "all about us," and done behind closed doors with no public proclaimation outside the four walls of the church. It is seldom made clear that it is all about what Jesus has done for us: His perfect life, his death, and his resurrecion, all given to us. It is not made clear that it is in the rising out of the water that the benefits of Christ' perfect life and his death; conviction, repentence, santification, and so forth are imputed to us. It is in the risen newness of life and the sight that is afforded by it that we can see the kingdom, hear the word of God and receive the faith by which we can believe into Christ, turn from sin and live in holiness. Far too often churches, and this is especially true of my SBC brethren, get it backwards.

My preference is that a person is not baptized until they can make a well reasoned confession. Since the idea of catechesis is no longer if vogue it makes it difficult for churches to set a mark. My daughter was baptized by me under the auspices of my pastor. But, I had her write her testimony and along with it and my announcement of her public testimony published in the newspaper, I baptized her in public, in a lake here in Cheyenne. My reasoning for this is Scripture. The testimony to the separtation that Christ has made of us from the world according to his choice should be public for the very purpose of preaching the Gospel by demonstration of its truth much like Abraham's offering of Isaac. The true "good works," that James speaks of is the faithful testimony to the world of Christ's works.

If I had my way our church would require catechism before baptism. Some may think that foolish. But, consider this: Though the disciples were called by Christ, he did not baptize them. There is no record of their baptism except for some who were baptized by John. A baptism which did not suffice as is testified to in Acts. They were taught by Christ for more than three years and were not "baptized" until Pentecost, if we are to take that as their baptism. The fact remains, that solid instruction, and truth filled understanding empowered by the Holy Spirit is the norm. Prudence teaches us that knowledge comes before understanding and wisdom from that. The first thing, and most precious of all to be sought is wisdom, "sell everything and buy her." When she is mature, wisdom will bring the youth before kings. Until then, the child should learn from its mother and father the Word which will make them wise for salvation. Then I say drown em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray B.,</p>
<p>Where do the ears come from to hear the gospel? Desire comes from understanding, and in John 3.3 it is written, &#8220;exept one is born from above he is not able to see the Kingdom.&#8221; The word for see here is eido which means to &#8220;know&#8221; or to comprehend with the mind. Literally it could mean sight, but it goes further than that, for Jesus in quoting Isaiah speaks of the eyes of the understanding being necessary for the repentant sinner to be able to turn and be saved. Those same Scriptures also include the ears.</p>
<p>Now it is a well known fact that when conception happens, (at conception a thing is born), the fetus has to develope the equipment to be able to hear. The word born come from the Old English word borne which means to be carried. Birth happens later when the one who has been born along breaks forth from the womb. So it is true that God has been knowing us from before we were formed in the womb. In other words, a person is born again long before they are ever able to discern, and therefore to desire to come to the Son. As Jesus said, the wind comes from where we know not but we see the effect of it. So is everyone who is born from above. That stange word anothen, beside meaning from above, carries the meaning &#8220;from the beginning,&#8221; also.</p>
<p>Baptism then comes after salvation and is not in obedience to faith but is born of it. This is neither a paedo or believers baptimal truth. John the baptist was a believer from the womb, so was David and Jeremiah. Perhaps Paul also. In Paul&#8217;s case it is obvious that his conversion in the &#8220;declarative&#8221; sense happened long after he was &#8220;called from the womb for this very pupose.&#8221; And, I do not remember his baptism&#8230;.and he was not sent to baptize, laying to waste the idea that it is necessary, demanded, or an anxious expediency. But it is expected.</p>
<p>I happen to believe in believer&#8217;s baptism. That means that a person is a believer when they are baptised, not a believer as a result of their baptism. For your formula to work, Ray, a person could not make the confession that they are believers in Christ until after they came up out of the water. What perameters then, do you use to determine who should be baptized? Seeing that, &#8220;For God loved the world in this way, that he gave his only begotten Son that that the ones who are believing in him should not perish but have eternal life.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have to agree that most of the reasoning and the means by which we baptize has to do with tradition. There is far more to commend believer&#8217;s baptism, however, especially in the aspect of public testimony. But, that is rarely carried out. Usually, baptism is portrayed as &#8220;all about us,&#8221; and done behind closed doors with no public proclaimation outside the four walls of the church. It is seldom made clear that it is all about what Jesus has done for us: His perfect life, his death, and his resurrecion, all given to us. It is not made clear that it is in the rising out of the water that the benefits of Christ&#8217; perfect life and his death; conviction, repentence, santification, and so forth are imputed to us. It is in the risen newness of life and the sight that is afforded by it that we can see the kingdom, hear the word of God and receive the faith by which we can believe into Christ, turn from sin and live in holiness. Far too often churches, and this is especially true of my SBC brethren, get it backwards.</p>
<p>My preference is that a person is not baptized until they can make a well reasoned confession. Since the idea of catechesis is no longer if vogue it makes it difficult for churches to set a mark. My daughter was baptized by me under the auspices of my pastor. But, I had her write her testimony and along with it and my announcement of her public testimony published in the newspaper, I baptized her in public, in a lake here in Cheyenne. My reasoning for this is Scripture. The testimony to the separtation that Christ has made of us from the world according to his choice should be public for the very purpose of preaching the Gospel by demonstration of its truth much like Abraham&#8217;s offering of Isaac. The true &#8220;good works,&#8221; that James speaks of is the faithful testimony to the world of Christ&#8217;s works.</p>
<p>If I had my way our church would require catechism before baptism. Some may think that foolish. But, consider this: Though the disciples were called by Christ, he did not baptize them. There is no record of their baptism except for some who were baptized by John. A baptism which did not suffice as is testified to in Acts. They were taught by Christ for more than three years and were not &#8220;baptized&#8221; until Pentecost, if we are to take that as their baptism. The fact remains, that solid instruction, and truth filled understanding empowered by the Holy Spirit is the norm. Prudence teaches us that knowledge comes before understanding and wisdom from that. The first thing, and most precious of all to be sought is wisdom, &#8220;sell everything and buy her.&#8221; When she is mature, wisdom will bring the youth before kings. Until then, the child should learn from its mother and father the Word which will make them wise for salvation. Then I say drown em!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17206</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17206</guid>
					<description>Kevin,
  Through the preaching of the gospel. It is a constant in the book of Acts. 
   The discussion is good. I have dialogued with people about scripture for many years. Keep it going. Sometimes I cannot get right back and this weekend I will be away from the computer but I will keep on answering when possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
  Through the preaching of the gospel. It is a constant in the book of Acts.<br />
   The discussion is good. I have dialogued with people about scripture for many years. Keep it going. Sometimes I cannot get right back and this weekend I will be away from the computer but I will keep on answering when possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Rhyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17203</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17203</guid>
					<description>Ray B.,

&lt;em&gt;I did answer your previous questions. I just did not know what else to say. I am not Calvinistic in my thinking of scripture. Baptism is a spiritual step of obedient faith.&lt;/em&gt;

I am glad that you do not view my comments to you as mean-spirited.  Sometimes in this medium it is easy to misunderstand tone.  I disagree with you, but in my disagreement I would rather have a reasoned dialogue, not a snarky exchange.  

That being said, (still not being snarky here) I perceive that your difficulty with the "Calvinistic thinking of Scripture" stems from the emphasis you seem to place on baptism as a means of regeneration in addition to faith in Christ.

Setting that aside, as others are addressing that issue much more eloquently than I in the next post, the question goes back to where does a fallen man even get the desire to be obedient to Christ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray B.,</p>
<p><em>I did answer your previous questions. I just did not know what else to say. I am not Calvinistic in my thinking of scripture. Baptism is a spiritual step of obedient faith.</em></p>
<p>I am glad that you do not view my comments to you as mean-spirited.  Sometimes in this medium it is easy to misunderstand tone.  I disagree with you, but in my disagreement I would rather have a reasoned dialogue, not a snarky exchange.  </p>
<p>That being said, (still not being snarky here) I perceive that your difficulty with the &#8220;Calvinistic thinking of Scripture&#8221; stems from the emphasis you seem to place on baptism as a means of regeneration in addition to faith in Christ.</p>
<p>Setting that aside, as others are addressing that issue much more eloquently than I in the next post, the question goes back to where does a fallen man even get the desire to be obedient to Christ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan W.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17187</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17187</guid>
					<description>Steve Scott,
You said: "Each side has reached its conclusions by deductive reasoning using presuppositions formed by other areas of systematic theology."
I'm curious, coming from a believer's baptism view, what you found in your studies about believer's baptism (b-b) that is based on "presuppositions formed by other areas of systematic theology."  I'm not sure where I would find a doctrine informing b-b in another area of my theology.  Except harmonizing with it in soteriology (saved by faith alone, grace alone, in Christ alone, and not by works).
Your conclusions seem to say to me that the Bible doesn't teach clearly enough about baptism, so choose whatever tradition fits best with your conscience.  Am I wrong with that understanding of your post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Scott,<br />
You said: &#8220;Each side has reached its conclusions by deductive reasoning using presuppositions formed by other areas of systematic theology.&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m curious, coming from a believer&#8217;s baptism view, what you found in your studies about believer&#8217;s baptism (b-b) that is based on &#8220;presuppositions formed by other areas of systematic theology.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not sure where I would find a doctrine informing b-b in another area of my theology.  Except harmonizing with it in soteriology (saved by faith alone, grace alone, in Christ alone, and not by works).<br />
Your conclusions seem to say to me that the Bible doesn&#8217;t teach clearly enough about baptism, so choose whatever tradition fits best with your conscience.  Am I wrong with that understanding of your post?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17183</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17183</guid>
					<description>Kevin, No , I do not think your response is mean - spirited. 
   Baptism is when you reach out and accept the gift, not the taking back of a gift or the delay , just the moment of accepting by faith the gift that does come because of the blood shed at the cross of Jesus Christ. 
    I did answer your previous questions.  I just did not know what else to say .I am not Calvinistic in my thinking of scripture. 
    Baptism is a spiritual step of obedient faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, No , I do not think your response is mean - spirited.<br />
   Baptism is when you reach out and accept the gift, not the taking back of a gift or the delay , just the moment of accepting by faith the gift that does come because of the blood shed at the cross of Jesus Christ.<br />
    I did answer your previous questions.  I just did not know what else to say .I am not Calvinistic in my thinking of scripture.<br />
    Baptism is a spiritual step of obedient faith.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Rhyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17175</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17175</guid>
					<description>Ray B.,

Please don't read a mean-spirited comment here, but now I understand the difficulty you were having answering the questions I posed &lt;a href="http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/03/29/why-i-am-a-calvinist-conclusion/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  It is foreign to talk about the nature of God's grace as revealed in Scripture when your salvation is conditioned upon a physical act.

A new heart that by nature operates in faith is a gift (Eph 2:8-9).  Baptism is obedience in response to the gift.  But the gift is not taken back if you are not baptized (Rom 11:29).  Nor is the gift delayed until you are baptized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray B.,</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t read a mean-spirited comment here, but now I understand the difficulty you were having answering the questions I posed <a href="http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/03/29/why-i-am-a-calvinist-conclusion/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  It is foreign to talk about the nature of God&#8217;s grace as revealed in Scripture when your salvation is conditioned upon a physical act.</p>
<p>A new heart that by nature operates in faith is a gift (Eph 2:8-9).  Baptism is obedience in response to the gift.  But the gift is not taken back if you are not baptized (Rom 11:29).  Nor is the gift delayed until you are baptized.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17169</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17169</guid>
					<description>Baptism is a response of faith. Gal. 3 : 26 and 27. It is what is involved in obedient faith . Romans 1 : 5 .
It is essential for salvation. I Peter 3 : 21 .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baptism is a response of faith. Gal. 3 : 26 and 27. It is what is involved in obedient faith . Romans 1 : 5 .<br />
It is essential for salvation. I Peter 3 : 21 .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17122</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17122</guid>
					<description>Nate and Others,
While I think a reasonable amount of examination is good, and we do a children's class, talk to parents, listen for a clear profession of repentance and faith and some evidence of change, I strongly hesitate to set an age requirement of any sort. If baptism is an act of obedience as we say it is, and we teach that in our church and Sunday school, what happens when we have children respond to this teaching sincerely with their childlike faith and desire to be baptized? To teach the truth, see them respond, then tell them they need to wait until a certain age seems dangerous for them and us.
I appreciate the discussion. It is very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate and Others,<br />
While I think a reasonable amount of examination is good, and we do a children&#8217;s class, talk to parents, listen for a clear profession of repentance and faith and some evidence of change, I strongly hesitate to set an age requirement of any sort. If baptism is an act of obedience as we say it is, and we teach that in our church and Sunday school, what happens when we have children respond to this teaching sincerely with their childlike faith and desire to be baptized? To teach the truth, see them respond, then tell them they need to wait until a certain age seems dangerous for them and us.<br />
I appreciate the discussion. It is very helpful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Something else to Think About &#171; A Steward of the Mysteries of God</title>
		<link>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17120</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sfpulpit.com/2007/04/11/how-young-is-too-young-children-and-baptism/#comment-17120</guid>
					<description>[...] April 11, 2007 Posted by Chase Sears in Practical Theology, Baptism, Theology, Ministry. trackback  At Pulpit Magazine there is an interesting article on Baptizing children. This is a subject thatI&#8217;m have conflicting ideas over. My initial thought is, we should not baptize children until they are of age to show they have a geniune understanding and belief in the Gospel. After all, I think I was a child who prooved not to have a right understanding and belief in the Gospel. However, I have difficulties justifying that initial thought when I read the Scripture. The pattern seems to be once a person professes Christ, he or she is immediatly baptized. I don&#8217;t see a biblical precedent for waiting for fruit? So what do you all think? I&#8217;d love to read some well thoughout arguments for both sides. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] April 11, 2007 Posted by Chase Sears in Practical Theology, Baptism, Theology, Ministry. trackback  At Pulpit Magazine there is an interesting article on Baptizing children. This is a subject thatI&#8217;m have conflicting ideas over. My initial thought is, we should not baptize children until they are of age to show they have a geniune understanding and belief in the Gospel. After all, I think I was a child who prooved not to have a right understanding and belief in the Gospel. However, I have difficulties justifying that initial thought when I read the Scripture. The pattern seems to be once a person professes Christ, he or she is immediatly baptized. I don&#8217;t see a biblical precedent for waiting for fruit? So what do you all think? I&#8217;d love to read some well thoughout arguments for both sides. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
