And though I have the gift of prophecy , and understand
all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all
faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not
charity, I am nothing.

And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and
though I give my body to be burnred, and have not charity, I am nothing.

Sure those words are demonstrative of CHARITY(TRUE
CHRISTIAN LOVE), but they also are demonstrative of
healthy Christian sarcasm.

Amen !

Though I speak with tongues of men and angels, and have
not charity, I am become as a sounding brass, or a
tinkling symbol.

” See there, Paul said I speak with tongues of angels”

Paul said no such thing! Paul used the word ” THOUGH “,
LIKE “even if I did”.

VERY IMPORTANT NOTE: The Angel of the Lord, made Balaam’s ass speak to Balaam in a
LANGUAGE(tongue) Balaam could understand. There was
no unintelligable gibberish(vain babbling) being emitted from the mouth of Balaam’s ass requiring an
interpreter.

You had better think about that.

When God sent his angels to tell Lot and his get out of
town and dont look back, Lot could converse with those
angels in the SAME LANGUAGE he was born, not some language of unintelligable exstatic incomprehensible
(vain babbling)requiring an interpreter.

You had batter think about that too!

When Paul said….

“Though I speak with men and angels and have not charity, I am become as a sounding brass, or a
tinkling symbol.”

HE ALSO SAID IN THE NEXT VERSE

“And THOUGH I have the gift of prophecy, and understand
all mysteries, and all knowledge; that I could remove
mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.”

Is there any record of Paul moving a literal mountain with his faith?
ANSWER: NO

HE ALSO SAID IN THE NEXT VERSE

“And THOUGH I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and
THOUGH I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.”

ASK YOURSELF

Is there record IN THE SCRIPTURES that Paul gave
everything he owned to be sold to feed the poor?

ANSWER: NO

Is there any record IN THE SCRIPTURES that Paul gave his body to be burned?

ANSWER: NO

You can point these things out to charismatics and
they will get mad, and tell you that………….

“You just don’t understand”, or “You had better be careful, you are blaspheming the Hooooooooooly Ghost.”

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Jesus Christ
we know that CHARITY….

1st Corinthians 13:6

Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the TRUTH.

When a charismatic rejoices in lying about those scriptures(1st Corinthians 13:1-3 most esp verse 1),
ask yourself is that CHARITY, or is it REJOICING IN
INIQUITY? (Matthew 7:21-23, 2nd Thes. 2:7).

God Bless

There are no cloven “tongues of fire” in a King James
Holy bible in Acts of The Apostles 2:3.

“LIKE AS OF FIRE”

The Perverted bibles OMITTED that that word LIKE in order to make their FAKE bibles line up the ROMAN
CATHOLIC DARKNESS.

J.Frank Norris didn’t believe in speaking in tongues
either did he?

Spurgeon did not believe speaking in tongues was for
his days or the days to come after him, did he ?

D.L. Moody didn’t believe in speaking in tongues either,
did he?

The men listed above God sealed them with the Holy
Spirit and empowered them to PREACH the Gospel of the
Grace of God, and win lost souls to Jesus Christ so
Jesus Christ could save their souls. The Holy Spirit
Jesus Christ empowered these men with saw no need
for “tongues” in these men he used to HIS OWN GLORY.
The Holy Spirit didn’t convince their converts that
they should “speak in tongues” either, did he?

Well God just simply is not the author of confusion
unless we apply this concept to Genesis 11, When God
the Father, God The Son, God the Holy Spirit confounded
and CONFUSED people with whom he was very displeased
with TONGUES.

Imagine THAT!

That was a great out pouring of the Holy Spirit.

” Go to, let US go down, and there confound their
language, that they may not understand one another’s
speech.”

The US can be found in 1st John 5:7.

God in that instance used tongues to STRONGLY DELUDE
people with whom he was very sore displeased.

God promised to send some DELUSION again in 2nd Thes 2
vs 11 and I am convinced that charismatic tongues is
exactly that.

I am not a polished or eloquent speaker. I am only a sorry old blood washed undeserving saved sinner.

I realise I probably rub some people the wrong way
because of my lack of eloquence, and inarticulate
grammar, lack of spelling skills and many other criticisms which which could be legitimately leveled
against me, but I have to just trust the Grace of God
on those shortcomings. So, to the real brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ please forgive me for the things I have said which have offended you.

The things I have said I have said with a greater
Love for the Savior Jesus Christ and for the LOVE
of HIS WORDS.

See Ya there, when we meet him in the air.
God Bless

They were already aware of who used such terminology
as…creed… crusade… cathecisms…., etc,. The
name they chose for their declaration of faith was far removed as they could keep it from the chosen terminoligy
of Rome.

They didn’t believe in speaking in tongues either, did
they?

They didn’t believe in women preachers either, did they?

Of course after the UNholy ghost revival of hell fire
continued to spread from AZUZA ST. , the devil started some charismatic churches and The Devil chose
to call them FULL Gospel Baptist,
but the HOLY BIBLE had warned real Baptists that the
FULL GOSPEL was not to be found IN THE BIBLE. They found out that the FULL Gospel is not the Gospel at all.
They found out that what people were calling the
FULL GOSPEL was what the Bible Called “another gospel”.
(2nd Cor 11:4, Gal. 1:1-9).

They Know none of the ministries God used to bring the
greatest REVIVAL there has ever been “The Great Awakening” believed in speaking in tongues, prophesying
in tongues, nor did they believe in the manifestations
of the charismatic movement.

The early Baptists didn’t even celebrate Christmas, due to the fact that they knew Christmas was not supported
BY THE SCRIPTURES, but was in fact Roman Catholic which
they all were sure was The Great Whore of Rev.17 and 18.
ISN’T THAT TRUE?

Based upon what the early Baptists believed Billy Graham
would be branded an Arch Heritic, or heck..they might
have even delivered Billy Graham, and Jack Van Impe to
Satan For the dustruction of the flesh, LIKE Paul did
Hymaneous and Philetus.

But, we know for sure the Baptist throughout history
were not tongues babblers.

He admitted while murdering the Jews that he was only
carrying out that which the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH had
been doing for doing to the Jews for centuries.

Read the “Vaticans Holocaust” and “Vietnam, why did
we go” written by Arvo Manhattan online for free at
Chic Publications.

BYE, BYE, no more pearls for the pigs.

Bob Jones Sr., couldn’t be fooled by those who claim to
speak in tongues and prophecy either could he.

John Wesley DID NOT speak in charismatic tongues either
did he?, not until a bunch of lying charismatics appear
and start LYING about church History.

D.L. Moody didn’t speak in tongues either, did he?
Billy Sunday didn’t beleive in speaking in tongues
either did he.

The Group of people who claim to speak in tongues have
a long recorded of SEX sins following their” annointed ”
elders, Don’t they?

John R. Rice couldn’t be fooled by the Charismatics
either, could he?

I would reccomend to any one reading to go look up John R. Rice on the internet and read what he had to say
about the Charismatic Movement, and TONGUES.

DOES IT?

“Baptists DO NOT hold to the Apostles Creed or any
Cathecism.”

WHAT! Are you kidding me? Haven’t you ever heard of The New Hampshire Baptist Confession (1833)? Or how about the Baptist Faith and Message (1963)? Not to mention a dozen other creeds and confessions (Westminster, Chicago Statement,et al). You say I’m not a Baptist because I believe in the continuity of spiritual gifts. It’s obvious who is and isn’t the real Baptist here. You don’t even know about the confessions and statement WE Baptist hold to.

“Adolph Hitler and Eugenio Pacelli who later changed his name to Pope Pius XII, both held to the Apostles Creed didn’t they?”

Uhh… NO! It’s common knowledge that Hitler was an atheistic communist. The Apostles Creed was compiled long before the apostate Roman Church was formed. Anyone who claims to hold to the creed and kills millions of Jews is obviously a blatant liar. The Creed itself is simply a statement of the universal acceptance of the essential doctrines of Christianity. Go back and read it. Anyone with eyes that can see and a brain that works can see that.

Give me scripture! Not mutilated interpretations and questionable history. If you do not have any Biblical Support for your claims other than something you read out of a charismatic bashing book or a fictional Gail Riplinger book then there is no point in discussing this issue any further.

God Bless and peace in Christ.